 |
| |
7
MOST RECENT PROJECTS - LAST UPDATED MAY 2008 |
|
 |
| |
|
1: WHY ARE SO MANY STRATEGIES FLAWED?:
We have observed that many companies develop and plan to implement strategies that are unlikely to succeed. Sometimes these are not implemented. Other times they lead to significant failures. We want to understand the root causes and find out if there are any simple cures. Since most managers have some education in strategy and are supported by strategy experts or consultants for most tricky decisions - it is odd that the quality of many strategies is still low.
2: DEVELOPING INTO NEW BUSINESSES:
This project focused on companies looking for new growth opportunities because of slow growth in their core markets. It involved shadowing 10 companies, assembling a database of 50 success stories and surveying 100 corporate venturing units. Publications include
"The Growth Gamble: When leaders should bet big on new businesses - and how they can avoid expensive failures"
by Andrew Campbell and Robert Park. "Stop Kissing Frogs", Harvard Business Review 2004 and "The Future of Corporate Venturing", Sloan Management Review 2003.
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
| |
3: DESIGNING COMPLEX ORGANISATIONS: This project examined the parenting challenges of organisations with complex matrix structures. It concluded that the parenting concept is still valuable even in organisatoins where the line between the "parent" and the "businesses" is hard to draw. The project also involved understanding both the rationale for creating complex organisations and how managers can improve their structural designs. A book "Designing Effective Organisations: How to Create Structured Networks" by Michael Goold and Andrew Campbell is published by Wiley and Jossey-Bass, 2002. An article was published in the Harvard Business Review,
"Do you have a well-designed organisation?"
. |
|
 |
| |
4: THE E-ENABLE CORPORATE
CENTRE:
This project
looked at the impact of electronic technologies on the
corporate centre. The outcome was a joint publication with PricewaterhouseCoopers
titled "Creating the E-Corporate Centre" by David Pettifer, Andrew Campbell
and Lucy Dennett. |
|
 |
| |
| 5:
SYNERGY (LINKS AMONG BUSINESS UNITS): This
project has looked at the lateral relationships in organisations
between business units and, in particular, the efforts
by corporate parents to create synergy by stimulating
coordination, skill sharing and other cross-unit initiatives.
The project developed a categorisation of 5 types of links
- know-how sharing, tangible resource sharing, pooled
bargaining power, vertical integration, strategic coordination
and combined new business development. |
 |
| The
main conclusion from the project was that managers, particularly
corporate-level managers, are biased in their thinking
about synergy which makes them too ambitious or over enthusiastic.
The solution is a dose of realism helped by "sizing the
prize", "pinpointing the parenting opportunities", "building
on skills" and "assessing the downsides". |
 |
| The
work has been published in two books: "Synergy! Why
Links Between Business Units often fail and how to make
them work", Andrew Campbell and Michael Goold, Capstone,
1998; "The
Collaborative Enterprise", Andrew Campbell
and Michael Goold, Perseus Books, 1998 and an article
"Desperately Seeking Synergy", Michael Goold and
Andrew Campbell, Harvard Business Review, September-October
1998. |
|
|
 |
| |
| 6:
CORPORATE-LEVEL STRATEGY:
This project
aimed to define what distinguished companies with successful
corporate-level strategies from less successful ones.
This led to an understanding of what corporate-level strategy
is, how it differs form business-level strategy and how
companies can set about developing new corporate-level
strategies. |
 |
| The
research observed that many companies do not have a corporate-level
strategy. All they have is a sum of their business-level
strategies. |
 |
| The
research has been widely published. The main book is "Corporate-Level
Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company",
Andrew Campbell, Michael Goold and Marcus Alexander, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994. |
 |
| A
more popular version is "Breakup! Why large companies
are worth more dead than alive", David Sadtler, Andrew
Campbell and Richard Koch, Capstone, 1997. |
 |
| The
lead articles are "Corporate Strategy: The Quest for
Parenting Advantage", Andrew Campbell, Michael Goold
and Marcus Alexander, Harvard Business Review,
March - April 1995 and "The Value of the Parent Company",
Andrew Campbell, Michael Goold & Marcus Alexander, California
Management Review, Vol. 38, No.1, Fall 1995. |
|
|
 |
| |
| 7:
BREAKUPS AND SPINOFFS:
This project looked
at companies that had decided voluntarily to break their
business up into smaller pieces by demerging or spinning
off parts of the organisation. The work focused on understanding
why this resulted in improved performance of the remaining
pieces, when managers should consider the strategy and
how best to go about it. |
 |
| The
work has been published in "Breakup! Why Large Companies
are Worth More Dead Than Alive", Andrew Campbell,
David Sadtler and Richard Koch, Capstone Publishing,
1997 and "Breakup: How companies use spin-offs to gain
focus & grow strong", David Sadtler, Andrew Campbell
and Richard Koch, The Free Press, 1997, US version.
Another related publication is "Demerging Organisations:
A guide to best practise" by Bill Tate, Financial
Times Management, 1999. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|